Practical tool

Check your writing with the Gunning Fog Index

The Gunning Fog Index estimates how many years of formal education a reader may need to understand a passage on first reading. It uses average sentence length and the percentage of words estimated to have three or more syllables. The score is a rough signal, not a verdict on accuracy, tone, accessibility or importance.

Key takeaways

  • Use a representative sample, not a heading or single sentence.
  • Inspect the causes of a score before rewriting.
  • Keep necessary technical terms when they carry precise meaning.
  • The calculator processes text only in your browser.

Local browser tool

Calculate a Fog score

Your text stays in this browser and is not uploaded or stored.

Fog score
Sentences
0
Words
0
Complex words
0
Average sentence
0.0
Complex-word share
0.0%

Enter a representative passage to see an estimate.

A worked edit: make the action clearer

Learning in practice

Same action, a clearer route

  1. Before

    Following completion of the initial assessment, participants are requested to undertake a subsequent revision of the documentation prior to submission.

    20 words · 1 sentence(s) · 9 estimated complex words · 20.0 words/sentence · 45.0% complex · Fog 26.0

  2. After

    Complete the initial assessment. Then revise the document before you submit it.

    12 words · 2 sentence(s) · 3 estimated complex words · 6.0 words/sentence · 25.0% complex · Fog 12.4

Calculated with the live tool’s unchanged English-word heuristic: 0.4 × (words ÷ sentences + 100 × complex words ÷ words). These short samples illustrate editing, not a reliable grade-level verdict. Complex-word counts are estimates.

Before: “Following completion of the initial assessment, participants are requested to undertake a subsequent revision of the documentation prior to submission.”

After: “Complete the initial assessment. Then revise the document before you submit it.”

The revision makes the order visible and replaces an indirect request with an action. It keeps the assessment, revision and submission as distinct steps. If the original instruction means revise only when feedback identifies a problem, add that condition explicitly; shortening the sentence must not remove it.

This example is too short to support a meaningful standalone readability verdict. Use a representative passage in the calculator, then review meaning, headings and necessary terminology. A lower Fog score cannot tell you whether the instructions are correct.

Move from a score to a better assignment

Use the student editing checklist to check the argument and evidence before polishing sentences.

For language assistance, our Grammarly assessment for students shows what one public-checker sample flagged and what still needed a human evidence check.

The formula

Fog score = 0.4 × (average sentence length + percentage of complex words). This implementation treats words with three or more estimated syllables as complex, while excluding common endings and proper-name clues where possible. Hyphenated forms are counted as one word; abbreviations and sentence punctuation are handled conservatively.

A cautious interpretation
Approximate scorePlain-English reading
6 to 8Generally accessible everyday prose
9 to 12Typical general or secondary-level material
13 to 16Dense, academic or specialist prose
17+Inspect long sentences and complex vocabulary closely

How to use the result

Start with the longest sentence. Split it only if the logical relationship remains clear. Then inspect complex words: replace an unnecessary abstraction, but keep an exact term when the audience needs it. Read the revision aloud and check whether the meaning, emphasis and rhythm improved.

A lower score is not automatically better. Legal, scientific and technical writing sometimes needs specialist vocabulary. A short sentence can still be vague, inaccurate or exclusionary. Pair the score with user testing, subject review and accessible structure.

What the score cannot measure

  • Whether a claim is true or well sourced.
  • Whether examples suit the reader’s background knowledge.
  • Whether the tone is respectful and inclusive.
  • Whether headings, layout and navigation support comprehension.
  • Whether a difficult idea has been simplified beyond accuracy.